FindTrial
Sign In

A comparative study of an Ultrasound guided versus anatomical landmark technique of subclavian vein cannulation

A Comparative study of real time ultrasound guided versus anatomical landmark technique of subclavian vein catheterization - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/062792
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-02-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: U072- COVID 19 virus not identified Health Condition 2: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: subclavian vein catheterization: under aseptic precautions, subclavian vein will be inserted with an 7frencch triple lumen catheter using ultrasound guided and confirmed by chest x-ray.

Sponsors

Deeksha Bidadi Mahipathi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient who require central venous catheterization in intensive critical care setup and surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pediatric population requiring central venous catheterization. Emergency CVC positioning. Derranged Pt, aPtt, INR and thrombocytopenia. Abnormal anatomical structur

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
subclavian vein catheterizationTimepoint: 1hr—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
subclavian vein catheter insituTimepoint: 1 week—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vasantha OT

yenepoya medical college

deekshabidadi@gmail.com9060409898

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026