A comparison between 2 videolaryngoscopes, Kingvision and VL3R (Hugemed) in patients posted for electiv surgery under general anaesthesia

A comparative study of Kingvision and VL3R (Hugemed)tm videolaryngoscope for the ease of intubation in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/02/062678

Enrollment

Registered

2024-02-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Intubation using VL3R (Hugemed) Videolaryngoscope: Investigator will pick the envelope with the name of one videolaryngoscope prior to premedication. Patients will be premedicated and p

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Written and well informed consent. 2. ASA grade I-II of either sex. 3. All Mallampatti grades. 4. Age between 18-60 years. 5. Weight between 45-70 Kg.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.ASA grade III and IV 2. Previous failed intubations 3. Head and neck surgery 4. Pregnancy 5. Inter incisor distance less than 3 cm 6. Risk of gastric regurgitation ( full stomach, hiatus hernia) 7. Raised ICP or cervical spine injury

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the time for successful intubation for both the devicesTimepoint: at first capnograph reading	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Change in haemodynamic parametersTimepoint: pre insertion, immediately post insertion, 3 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes;Ease of intubationTimepoint: At end of intubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSyed Kamran Habib

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh

syedkamranhabib@gmail.com9897172780

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026