FindTrial
Sign In

Dinoprostone vaginal insert vs Oral misoprostol in induction of labour

Comparative study of Dinoprostone vaginal insert and oral misoprostol for Induction of labour - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/062661
Enrollment
158
Registered
2024-02-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O80- Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery

Interventions

Intervention1: Induction of labour: All participants in inclusion criteria are induced with either of drugs ,oral misoprostol solution or dinoprostone vaginal insert and outcomes are noted Interventio

Sponsors

Naga Manikya Veena
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Cephalic presentation normal fetal heart rate bishop score less than 4 Singleton pregnancy gestational age greater than 37weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Previous Caesarean section previous uterine surgery Abnormal presentations estimated fetal weight greater than 4000grams Hypersensitivity to dinoprostone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Obstetrical outcome: mode of delivery,induction to delivery time interval,Caesarean section rate Timepoint: During the time of delivery.At term i.e greater than 37weeks of period of gestation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
APGAR score, NICU stays and other neonatal complicationsTimepoint: At time of delivery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrJyothi Shetty

Kasturba Medical College,Manipal

jthshetty@gmail.com9845973697

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026