FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the efficacy of using two different devices in facilitating the artificial ventilation in patients by simulating cervical stabilization.

To Compare the Efficacy of Using Video Laryngoscope against Airtraq Laryngoscope for Intubation in Patients by Simulating cervical Stabilization

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/062559
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-02-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparison between two devices in facilitating artificial ventilation in patients: Comparison between video laryngoscope and Airtraq laryngoscope for intubation in patients by simulati

Sponsors

Vinayaka Missions Kirupananda Variyar Medical College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor
DrPNaveena
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 and 2 patients, Modified Mallampatti score 1-4,Modified Cormack Lehane score 1-4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA 3 and 4,Inter incisor distance less than 3 cm,Patients recognized as having difficult laryngoscope and intubation using preanesthetic evaluation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total intubation time and number of attempts Timepoint: Within 10 minutes—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the glottic view need for external laryngeal manoeuvre hemodynamic changesTimepoint: Within 10 minutes—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr P Naveena

Vinayaka Missions Kirupanada Variyar Medical College and Hospital

Cpriyanka55@gmail.com09789092597

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026