FindTrial
Sign In

A comparison of the 8-foot-up-and-go test with four-square step tests effectiveness in assessing dynamic balance in elderly individuals.

Comparing the efficacy of four square step test and 8 foot up and go test to evaluate dynamic balance in elderly individuals. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/062529
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-02-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Shweta Rajesh Nainani
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Older adults of both genders that are functionally independent and are 60 years of age or above will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Older adults having history of cardio vascular and recent surgeries, Sensory or neurological impairments, Any past history of neurological and musculoskeletal conditions of lower limb, Any other Diseases that might have an influence on balance or gait or Any problems that might impair the ability to communicate information about fall status and frequency will be excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Four square step test 8 Foot up and go testTimepoint: 1 time—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nensi Vaibhav Gandhi

College of physiotherapy, sumandeep vidyapeeth deemed to be university

shwetanainani18@gmail.com9325673651

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026