Skip to content

Comparing Breather Device versus Inspiratory Muscle Training for Improved Trunk Stability in Spinal Cord Injury Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Study

Effectiveness of Resistive Respiratory Training using Breather Device Versus Inspiratory Muscle Training in Enhancing the Trunk Stability among Spinal cord Injury Survivors: A Randomized Control Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/062507
Enrollment
90
Registered
2024-02-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G958- Other specified diseases of spinalcord

Interventions

Intervention1: Breather: The resistive respiratory muscle training using the BREATHER will involve 20 minutes, twice daily, six times a week for three weeks, along with trunk stabilization exercises f

Sponsors

Dr Janardhana Aithala P
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Participants must be between the ages of 18 and 50 and have traumatic paraplegia resulting from a spinal cord injury at the neurological level of T1-T7. 2 ASIA scale A and B 3 Spinal cord injury survivors with a sitting balance score of = 1 on the trunk control test. (TCT) 4 Participants must be at least 15 days post-surgery and medically stable.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants will be excluded from the study if; 1 Traumatic Brain Injury. 2 The individuals are not able to follow the instructions. 3 Traumatic pneumothorax that has not fully healed. 4 Burst eardrum or other conditions of the eardrum. 5 Unstable asthma with an abnormally low perception of dyspnoea. 6 Major fractures in the lower limb like the Pelvis and long bones. 7 Neuromuscular disorders. 8 Preexisting neurological disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Thickness of Diaphragm and Rectus abdominis muscle. 2. Sitting Balance: Sitting balance Measure and Lord Sway meter.Timepoint: At the baseline of the study and upon completion of the 3-week evaluation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life: Spinal cord independence Measure.Timepoint: Upon completion of 3 weeks of intervention.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRinku Roshan

Father Muller Medical College

rinkurosh777@fathermuller.in09945935788

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026