FindTrial
Sign In

Intubating/securing airway using 2 different instruments in surgery under General Anaesthesia

Comparison of intubation characteristics using Clearvue Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for elective nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer - A randomized interventional study at SMS Medical College, Jaipur - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/062492
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-02-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Intubation with Clearvue Videolaryngoscope: Comparison of intubation characteristics using Clearvue Videolaryngoscope for elective nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeri

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached hospitals
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Undergoing elective head and neck cancer surgery requiring nasotracheal intubation. 2. Patients of either sex willing to give consent. 3. Age group of age 20-60. 4. ASA grade I, II& III. 5. El-Ganzouri risk index (EGRI) 1- = 7.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Risk of gastric aspiration. 2. If more than 3 attempts taken to intubate. 3. Mouth opening less than 2.5 cm. 4. Patients difficult to mask ventilate. 5. History of difficult intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean time taken for IntubationTimepoint: 0, 30sec, 1min—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
airway complications during endotracheal intubation between the two groups (esophageal intubation, mucosal bleeding, episodes of desaturation during intubation (SPO2 <92% ).Timepoint: After Induction;First attempt intubation success rate and number of intubation attempts between the groups.Timepoint: After Induction;Hemodynamic changes (SDP, DBP, MAP, HR, SPO2) between the two groupsTimepoint: Baseline, After Induction, at 1 min, at 5 min;Intubation difficulty scoreTimepoint: After Induction;To compare glottic visualisation between the groups using Modified Cormack Lehane grading.Timepoint: After Induction;Use of accesory manoeuvresTimepoint: After Induction—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kevin George

S.M.S Medical College and Attached Hospitals

drmamtasharma@hotmail.com9829566077

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026