Comparison of non channeled King Vision vs Hugemed videolaryngoscope blades during tracheal intubation

A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDY OF TRACHEAL INTUBATION WITH NON CHANNELED KING VISION VS HUGEMED VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE BLADES - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/02/062397

Enrollment

Registered

2024-02-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C509- Malignant neoplasm of breast of unspecified site Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 3: H719- Unspecified cholesteatoma

Interventions

Intervention1: Group Kingvision: videolaryngoscopy before tracheal intubation Intervention2: Group Hugemed: videolaryngoscopy before tracheal intubation in seconds Control Intervention1: Group KingVis

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ALL ASA grade I and II patients All modified mallampati class I and II patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: All ASA grade III and IV patients Diabetes and hypertension Pregnant and lactating women Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) Drug allergy Hepatic and renal disease

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Intubation time Glottic viewTimepoint: Baseline time in seconds at intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
First attempt & overall intubation success rate External laryngeal manipulation like BURP to improve glottis view Subjective degree of difficulty in intubation using five point likert scaleTimepoint: Baseline after intubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR DEEPA KATTISHETTAR

Mysore Medical College, Mysore.

deepapalax@gmail.com9611104343

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026