Skip to content

Comparison of two techniques of upper limb block in upper limb surgeries

“A Comparison of ultrasound-guided vs peripheral nerve stimulator guided supraclavicular block in upper limb surgeries ? - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/062198
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-02-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S521- Fracture of upper end of radius

Interventions

Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Shree krishna hospital,anand
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients ASA(american society of anaesthesia) I, II and III physical status 2)Age 18-70yrs of either sex 3)Patients undergoing upper limb surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients refusal to regional anaesthesia 2) Skin infection located on or near block injection site 3) Allergy to local anesthetics 4) Presence of bleeding disorder or coagulopathy 5) Patients with preexisting neurological deficit of the same limb 6) Psychiatric disorder 7) Bilateral upper limb surgery 8) Severe chronic obstructive or restrictive lung disease 9) Requirement of conversion to general anaesthesia due to inadequate block

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1)Assess the efficacy & procedure duration in view of onset of sensory blockade in supraclavicular block ultra sound guided vs peripheral nerve stimulator guided block. Secondary outcome 1)to compare the two techniques of supraclavicular block in terms of Onset of sensory and motor block. 2)to compare the two techniques of supraclavicular block in terms of Block success rate 3)To compare the hemodynamic parameters: Heart-rate, systolic & diastolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation & complications like vascular punctures, pneumothorax, nerve palsies, hematoma formation and infection at injection site. Timepoint: 10-20mins

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1)to compare the two techniques of supraclavicular block in terms of Onset of sensory and motor block. 2)to compare the two techniques of supraclavicular block in terms of Block success rate 3)To compare the hemodynamic parameters: Heart-rate, systolic & diastolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation & complications like vascular punctures, pneumothorax, nerve palsies, hematoma formation and infection at injection site. Timepoint: 5-15 mins

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR VATSAL PARIKH

H M Patel center for medical care and education

vatsalparikh.vp@gmail.com8200643179

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026