Comparison of two laryngeal mask airway devices as a conduit for endotracheal intubation

I gel as a conduit for endotracheal intubation compared with air q as a conduit for endotracheal intubation - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/01/062087

Enrollment

Registered

2024-01-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: tracheal intubation using supraglottic device: tracheal intubation using supraglottic device i gel or AIR Q ILMA as a conduit Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention2: NIL:

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade 1 and 2 patients BMI less than 30 MP class 1 and 2 Patients planned for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any facial anomaly Fixed flexion deformity Patient at risk of pulmonary aspiration Decreased inter incisor distance less than 3 cm short thyromental distance less than 6cm

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Intubation timeTimepoint: time in seconds taken in between the device introduction between two incisors till it is removed after endotracheal intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. To compare the number of attempts required for successful intubation 2. To compare the glottic view using BRIMACOMBE scoring 3. To look for any airway complications after extubation like blood on ET Tube, sore throat , dental traumaTimepoint: 1.during intubation 2.after extubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactObaid Ahmed Siddiqui

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College , Aligarh Muslim University , Aligarh

obaidahmad2008@gmail.com8289976038

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026