Comparison of flexible & navigable access sheath with traditional ureteral access sheath during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Comparison of the safety, efficacy and stone-free rate of the new flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath with the traditional ureteral access sheath during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/01/062036

Enrollment

Registered

2024-01-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: N200- Calculus of kidney Health Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): RIRS surgery with the use of traditional ureteral access sheath. Control Intervention1: Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: RIRS with

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patient with renal pelvic and calyceal stones ranging from 10-25 mms undergoing primary or staged RIRS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Renal stones more than 25 mms patient unwilling for Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Urosepsis Bleeding tendencies Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate the outcome in terms of stone free rates with the use of flexible and navigable suction (FANS) sheath as compared to the traditional ureteral access sheath (UAS) during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)Timepoint: 3 month	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of FANS with the traditional UAS during RIRSTimepoint: 3 month	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRekha Uttam Chavan

Sai Urology Hospital

drabhaymahajan@gmail.com9822321224

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026