Checking Retention of denture bases fabricated with three different technichques

: A Comparative Evaluation of Retention of Record Bases fabricated with Conventional Compression Molding, CAD- CAM Milling, and 3D-printing– An In vivo Pilot Study. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Observational

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/01/061968

Enrollment

Registered

2024-01-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified

Interventions

Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with well-formed edentulous maxillary arch 2. Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with excessive maxillary ridge resorption. 2. Patients with a bony undercut of more than 2 mm in the maxillary ridge 3. Patients with flabby ridge, papillary hyperplasia, epulis fissuratum.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Retention values of three groups will be compared to see which group exhibits greater retention valuesTimepoint: Baseline retention values will be assessed	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The best technique will be employed clinicallyTimepoint: Baseline	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Swapna B V

Manipal Academy of Higher Education

swapna.bv@manipal.edu9880359889

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026