Skip to content

Difference in evaluation in binocular vision parameters when evaluating at clinic or at home(in-remote) setting with vision therapy software application.

Software Based Approach for Evaluation and Treatment of Amblyopia administered remotely and in clinic - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/01/061785
Enrollment
400
Registered
2024-01-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H539- Unspecified visual disturbance

Interventions

Control Intervention1: nil: nil

Sponsors

Aditya Goyal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects with BCVA better than 1.0 Log MAR were included in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with strabismus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
There were no changes between evaluation parameters in remote and in-clinic settings using a software-based Vision Therapy System for amblyopia.Timepoint: it was evaluated only at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There were no changes between evaluation parameters in remote & in-clinic settings using a software-based Vision Therapy System for amblyopia.Timepoint: 1 year study

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPoonam Rani

Sankara college of Optometry

shrutidagar54@gmail.com9988174612

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026