FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARING EFFECT OF HYPERBARIC ROPIVACAINE VS LEVOBUPIVACAINE, WITH NALBUPHINE AS ADDITIVE IN SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN LOWER LIMB SURGERIES.

Comparing efficacy & post operative analgesic effect of Hyperbaric ROPIVACAINE vs LEVOBUPIVACAINE , with NALBUPHINE as Adjuvant in lower limb surgeries. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/01/061468
Enrollment
58
Registered
2024-01-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: -

Interventions

Intervention1: Spinal Anaesthesia with Ropivacaine: Spinal anaesthesia with 0.75% Hyperbaric Ropivacaine 24 mg with Nalbuphine 1 mg as adjuvant via intrathecal rout Control Intervention1: Spinal anae

Sponsors

SHREE KRISHNA HOSPITAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for lower limb surgery. 18 to 65 years old patients. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status grade I-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients refusing in taking part in the study Allergy to local anaesthetic drug & opioids Absolute contraindication to spinal anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To Compare effectiveness and post-operative analgesic effect by modified bromag scoreTimepoint: To Compare effectiveness and post-operative analgesic effect until mobilisation of pt—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Intra operative hemodynamic stability Comparison of wearing off effect of sensory & motor blockedTimepoint: during time of surgery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Akshay Patel

SHREE KRISHNA HOSPITAL & PRAMUKHSWAMI MEDICAL COLLEGE

ushmavp@charutarhealth.org9825577959

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026