FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWO SURGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR REPAIR OF EAR DRUM PERFORATION

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO TECHNIQUES OF MYRINGOPLASTY- ONLAY VERSUS UNDERLAY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/01/061460
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-01-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H673- Otitis media in diseases classified elsewhere, bilateral

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Kasturba Medical College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: PATIENTS WITH LARGE CENTRAL PERFORATION OF TYMPANIC MEMBRANE UNDERGOING MYRINGOPLASTY

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)PREVIOUS MASTOID SURGERY 2) ATELECTATIC EAR 3)CHOLESTEATOMA 4) ACTIVELY DISCHARGING EAR 5) OSSICULAR CHAIN PATHOLOGY

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
COMPARISON OF GRAFT UPTAKE RATES BETWEEN THE TWO TECHNIQUESTimepoint: 4,8,12 WEEKS—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pure tone audiogram threshold between underlay and overlay technique. Timepoint: 4, 8 and 12 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKAILESH PUJARY

Department of ENT, Kasturba Medical College, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Udupi, Karnataka

kailesh.pujary@manipal.edu09845144015

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026