FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of video laryngoscopes on the basis of presence of tube guide channel in participants with expected difficulty in intubation

Ease of intubation using videolaryngoscopes in patients with anticipated difficult intubation - a comparison between chanelled and non chanelled blades

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/01/061451
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-01-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Laryngoscopy: laryngoscopy using chanelled and non chanelled blades of videolaryngoscopy is done on the study subject

Sponsors

lokmanya tilak municipal hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.ASA physical status I - III , receiving general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation 2.Scheduled to undergo elective surgery 3.anticipated to have difficult intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. patients with high risk of gastric regurgitation 2. pregnant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
comparison of ease of intubation between channelled and non channelledTimepoint: at baseline , 15sec , 30 sec—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the first attempt success rate of tracheal intubation using chanelled and non chanelled videolaryngoscopes bladeTimepoint: baseline , completion of intubation , 10 sec 20 sec 30 sec—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public Contactmansi bhale

lokmanya tilak municipal hospital

virkarnilam83@gmail.com7506355637

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026