Skip to content

comparison of two soft tissue grafting techniques for treatment of bone loss.

Efficacy of marginal approach with and without connective tissue graft and apical approach with connective tissue graft in the management of Cairo’s-RT2 gingival recession with combined intra- suprabony defects -a randomised controlled study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/01/061438
Enrollment
33
Registered
2024-01-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: OPEN FLAP DEBRIDEMENT: Marginal approach full thickness flap will be raised and debrided Intervention2: CT wall technique group: Surgical technique will consist the use of a connective

Sponsors

Government Dental College And Research institute Bangalore
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Male and female subjects of age 19-55yrs subjects with good general health-ASA 1,ASA-2 2.Subjects with diagnosis of periodontitis Stage II, III 3.Teeth with buccal RT2 recession associated with an intra-bony defect 4.Full mouth plaque score 5.Presence of at least one intraosseous defect with presurgical probing depth >5mm and radiographic intrabony component > 3mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Grade C periodontitis. • Smoking habits. • Pregnancy and lactation. • History of periodontal surgery or prosthetic restorations at the experimental teeth. • Clinical evidence of furcation defects at the surgical site. • Mobility of teeth greater than Grade I. • Non vital teeth or trauma from occlusion. • Presence of non carious lesion at the involved site • uncontrolled diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Location of the tip of the papilla( TP)- distance from CEJ to the vertex of papilla[baseline-6 months] 2.Interproximal clinical attachment level gain- difference in distance from CEJ and base of pocket 3.Root Coverage Esthetic scoreTimepoint: 1.baseline and 6 months 2.baseline and 6 months 3.Basline and 6 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Bleeding on probing: recorded as positive when bleeding on probing present at the surgical site. 2.Radiographic defect consolidation 3.Probing pocket depth reduction (difference in the probing depth(gingival margin – base of pocket) 4.Residual probing depth-distance from gingival margin to base of pocket. 5. Width of keratinized tissue - measured form the mid-buccal aspect of the base gingival margin to the mucogingival line 6.Relative attachment level Measured from the stent margin to the bottom of the periodontal pocket to the nearest mm 7.Healing assessmentTimepoint: 1.baseline and 6months 2.baseline and 6 months 3.baseline and 6 months 4.baseline,3months and 6 months 5.baseline and 6 months 6. baseline,3months,6months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDEEPIKA SHARMA

Government dental college and research institute

periosmitha@gmail.com9449630572

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026