Comparison of CE and Modified Thener Eminence mask ventilation techniques

Comparison of two handed C-E technique with Modified Thenar Eminence technique for mask ventilation in adults - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/01/061352

Enrollment

Registered

2024-01-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: comparison of two handed C-E technique with modified thenar eminence technique for mask ventilation in adults: adult patients undergoing surgery in general anaesthesia will be compared

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: adults aged 18 to 65 years undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia requiring controlled mechanical ventilation with American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 1 and 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Induction requiring rapid sequence intubation 2. Patients with dressing/ scars/ beard/ raw area over face/ intra oral or pharyngeal masses

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare two handed C-E technique & the modified thenar eminence technique for mask ventilation by its efficacy in maintaining expired tidal volumeTimepoint: The average of five breaths at end of 30 seconds will be used in the statistical analysis of expired tidal volume for each technique	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare two handed C-E technique & the modified thenar eminence technique for mask ventilation by its efficacy in maintaining 1. mean airway pressure 2. mean etCO2 3. ease of ventilation according to Likert scaleTimepoint: The average of five breaths at end of 30 seconds will be used in the statistical analysis of mean airway pressure & etCO2. Ease of ventilation sore will also be assessed between the two techniques using the Likert scale (easy-1, moderate-2 & difficult-3)	—

Measure

Time frame

To compare two handed C-E technique & the modified thenar eminence technique for mask ventilation by its efficacy in maintaining 1. mean airway pressure 2. mean etCO2 3. ease of ventilation according to Likert scaleTimepoint: The average of five breaths at end of 30 seconds will be used in the statistical analysis of mean airway pressure & etCO2. Ease of ventilation sore will also be assessed between the two techniques using the Likert scale (easy-1, moderate-2 & difficult-3)

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKavita Rani Sharma

Varhaman Mahavir medical college and Safdarjung hospital

drkavitadn@gmail.com9968604376

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026