Comparison between Macintosh laryngoscope and king vision vidio laryngoscope for intubation in oral cancer surgery patients.

Randomized controlled study to compare the status of intubation and haemodynamic changes using Macintosh laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope in patients requiring nasotracheal intubation undergoing oral cancer surgery

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/01/061207

Enrollment

Registered

2024-01-08

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Use of Normal macintosh laryngoscope. for Nasotracheal intubation in oral cancer surgery patients.: Nasotracheal intubation to be done in oral cancer surgery patient by senior anaesthes

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients more than 18 years of either gender

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients refusal patients with nasal deformities or fracture

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
compared to Macintosh , king vision vidio laryngoscope is expected to take lesser number of attemps & lesser duration insertion to secure the airwayTimepoint: 2 years	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
lesser haemodynamic changes with king vision vidio laryngoscope as compared to macintosh laryngoscopeTimepoint: 2 years	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShubham Badal Petkar

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research

drvivekchakole@rediffmail.com7583836564

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026