Skip to content

To Compare Functional Outcomes Between Half Hip Joint Replacement and Internal Fixation in Patients with Hip Surgeries.

Comparison of Functional Outcomes between Hip Hemiarthroplasty and Internal Fixation in Patients with Hip Surgeries. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/01/061122
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-01-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M966- Fracture of bone following insertion of orthopedic implant, joint prosthesis, or bone plate

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: Comparison of Functional Outcomes: Patient undergone hip surgery & who will be coming for the follow up after 6 weeks their hip adductor muscle strength

Sponsors

Poonam Yadav
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients between age of 18 to 70 years who are treated with Hip Hemi arthroplasty at 6 weeks post-surgery and Patients operated with Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal femoral nail for hip fracture at 6 weeks post-surgery including Both the genders.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who have revision surgeries for hip joint. Bilateral involvement of the hip joint, Any neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that affect the outcome measures, Unwillingness to participate in the study are excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hip Abductor Muscle Strength using sphygmomanometer Timepoint: 6 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Modified Harris hip scoreTimepoint: 6 week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Niketa Patel

College of Physiotherapy Sumandeep Vidyapeeth deemed to be University

niketa.cop@sumandeepvidyapeethdu.edu.in9099774190

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026