Safer technique among Ultrasound guided central line insertion versus blind technique.

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided Right internal jugular venous catheterisation versus landmark technique of right internal jugular venous catheterisation in cardiovascular surgeries-A randomised study. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/01/061121

Enrollment

Registered

2024-01-04

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasound guided central venous catheterisation: Ultrasound guided central venous catheterisation of right intenal jugular vein Control Intervention1: Anatomical landmark technique

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients posted for elective cardiac surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.burn contracture at the insertion site. 2.infection and inflammation at the insertion site. 3.left IJV cannulation.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare efficacy & safety of usg guided versus landmark technique of right internal jugular venous catheterisation in cardiovascular surgeries.Timepoint: pilot prick time scanning time time of return of venous blood from cvp cannula	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
to know complications associated with both usg guided & landmark technique of right internal jugular venous catheterisationTimepoint: Baseline	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactYEJALLA OMPRAKASH

MGM MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

y.op763769@gmail.com8919762382

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026