comparing intubation in trachea with two devices in patients with snoring who are risk for difficult intubation using an assessing score

Comparison of awake oral tracheal intubation with flexible bronchoscope versus video laryngoscope in patients at risk of obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/01/061055

Enrollment

Registered

2024-01-02

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: kings vision channeled video laryngoscope: Channeled video laryngoscope is a form of indirect laryngoscopy for visualisation of larynx transorally for intubation in patients undergoing

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American society of anesthesiologist grade I-II , Morbidly obese patients, Age >18, Stop bang scoring >3 posted for elective surgery under General Anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient refusal to give consent 2. Patient with laryngeal or pharyngeal pathology 3. Patient mouth opening 4. Lean body 5. Pregnant patients 6. Patient with Heart rate 7. Patient with local anaesthetic allergy 8. Patient with airway bleeding 9. Patient with fixed flexion deformity

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare time to intubation using flexible bronchoscope and video-laryngoscope for awake oral tracheal intubation in patients at risk of OSA.Timepoint: Total time for for intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. To compare first attempt success rate between the groups 2. To compare hemodynamic response to intubation between the groups 3. To compare patient discomfort score between the groups 4. To compare intraoperative complications like episodes of desaturation ( oropharyngeal mucosal damageTimepoint: Hemodynamic response over 15 minutes after intubation Monitor post-operative complication over 24 hours	—

Measure

Time frame

1. To compare first attempt success rate between the groups 2. To compare hemodynamic response to intubation between the groups 3. To compare patient discomfort score between the groups 4. To compare intraoperative complications like episodes of desaturation ( oropharyngeal mucosal damageTimepoint: Hemodynamic response over 15 minutes after intubation Monitor post-operative complication over 24 hours

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAPPARI SRI DURGA SIVA PRASAD

Hamdard institute of medical sciences and research

pratibha.panjiar@gmail.com9311657822

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026