FindTrial
Sign In

A comparitive study between two laryngoscope C- MAC D- Blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope on their effectiveness in airway management

A comparison between C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy on ease of intubation and hemodynamics at laryngoscopy and intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/12/060965
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-12-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Regional Cancer Centre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Modified Mallampati class 3 and 4 and thyromental distance less than 6 cm 2. ASA PS I and II 3. BMI between 18.5 and 24.9

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. restricted neck mobility 2. limited mouth opening ( less than 3 cm) 3. hypertensive patients on beta blockers 4. major cardiovascular diseases 5. hyperthyroidism 6. pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to compare the time taken for sucessful intubation using C-MAC D_ Bladevideolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult airwayTimepoint: at the time of intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to compare the changes in hemodynamic parameters ( heart rate and blood pressure) need for any optimizing Maneuvres and number of intubatin attemptsTimepoint: 1, 3,5 and 10 minutes ( hemodynamic parameters) optimizing maneuvres and number of attempts- at the time of intubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Krishna P H

Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram

venuanila@yahoo.com9447220032

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026