Skip to content

Awake Fibreoptic Nasotracheal Intubation In Oral Cancer Patients

Comparative Study of Spray As You Go Technique Using 2% Lignocaine Versus 4% Lignocaine In Awake Fibreoptic Nasotracheal Intubation In Oral Cancer Patients - NA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/12/060732
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-12-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C109- Malignant neoplasm of oropharynx,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Lignocaine 2% and 4%: at the times of intubation 24hrs Control Intervention1: comparison time of intubation Lignocaine 2% and 4%: time of intubation at 24hrs

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients giving written informed consent. Aged between 18-60 years of both sex. American Society of Anaesthesiologists grading of I and II. Patients having Mallampati grading of 3 and 4 and or mouth opening less than 2 fingers. Patients with anticipated difficult airway undergoing elective dental and surgical oncology procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any type of A-V block on electrocardiogram (ECG), heart failure, coronary heart disaese. Liver cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia and coagulopathies. Severe bradycardia. Current psychiatric disorder, history of seizures. Any respiratory disorders. History of epistaxis, nasal pathology. Known drug allergy to the study drugs. ASA III and ASA IV. Pregnant females. Emergency procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the ease of intubation ( by patient tolerance, vocal cord movement and cough severity score) between 2 groups receiving 2% lignocaine & receiving 4% lignocaine respectively through spray as you go techniqueTimepoint: To compare the ease of intubation ( by patient tolerance, vocal cord movement and cough severity score) between 2 groups receiving 2% lignocaine & receiving 4% lignocaine respectively through spray as you go technique

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Number of attempts taken for intubation. 2. Total time duration taken for intubation. 3. Total volume of local anaesthetic drug used. 4. Cough severity. 5. Hemodynamic changes during intubation. 6. Adverse events in postoperative period. Timepoint: 1. number of attempts taken for intubation. 2. Total time duration taken for intubation. 3. Total volume of local anaesthetic drug used. 4. Cough severity. 5. Hemodynamic changes during intubation. 6. Adverse events in postoperative period.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Manoj Kumar Chaurasiya

King Georges Medical University Lucknow

mchh3131@gmail.com9506823989

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026