A comparison between levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine with nalbuphin in wound infiltration for selected abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia.

A comparison of analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine versus levobupivacaine with nalbuphin in surgical site infiltration technique for selected lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/12/060617

Enrollment

100

Registered

2023-12-21

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L089- Local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, unspecified Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Subcutaneous infiltration with levobupivacaine alone in surgical site: Route of administration subcutaneous infiltration at surgical site Dose 2 mg per kg To observe analgesia for 24

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade 1 and 2 No history of allergy to local anesthetic agent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: pediatric and old age ASA grade 3 and 4 Patient who have chronic pain and on treatment patient on narcotics corticosteroid severe cardiopulmonary renal and liver disease allergic to study drug pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
TO Compare the duration of post operative analgesiaTimepoint: 8hours	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
to evaluate the requirement of first rescue analgesia & quality of analgesia Timepoint: 8 to 10 hours	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ankita Patel

GCS Medical College Hospital and research center

drankitapatel30@gmail.com9712981484

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026