FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of intubation using channelled and non-channelled blades of King Vision Video Laryngoscope.

Comparison of tracheal intubation using channelled and non-channelled blades of King Vision™ video laryngoscope with manual inline stabilization – A randomized clinical trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/11/060362
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-11-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Channelled bladeof king vision videolaryngoscope: Comparing the time required for tracheal intubation using channelled blade of KIng Vision Videolaryngoscope Control Intervention1: Non-

Sponsors

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate medical Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients scheduled for elective surgeries requiring general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. 2. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-II, age between 18 to 70 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Cervical spine pathology 2.BMI more than or equal to 30 3.Restriction of neck extension 4.Increased risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration 5.History of difficult tracheal intubation in the past. 6.Tumor or mass involving the airway. 7.Restricted mouth opening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the time required for tracheal intubation in Channelled and Non channelled blades of King Vision™ Video laryngoscope in a patient with manual inline stabilisationTimepoint: 5 minutes—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the associated complications like desaturation,airway mucosal trauma,brochospasm and esophageal intubation.Timepoint: 1 hour;To assess the ease of insertion of laryngoscope blade and ease of intubation in both groups.Timepoint: 5 minutes;To compare hemodynamic response to intubation and laryngoscopy in both groups.Timepoint: 10 minutes;To compare percentage of glottis opening score in both groups.Timepoint: 5 minutes;To compare the success rate of first attempt intubation in both the groups.Timepoint: 5 minutes;To compare the time interval for glottic visualisationTimepoint: 5 minutes—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr GnanasekaranS

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research

gnansdr@gmail.com9487188275

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026