Skip to content

comparing the efficacy of two different types of supraglottic airway devices

Comparison of placement efficacy of inflatable cuff & non-inflatable cuff supraglottic airway device when used by trainee anaesthesiologists in patients under general anaesthesia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/11/060262
Enrollment
130
Registered
2023-11-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: iGel: observation of performace characteristics when placed by trainee anaesthesiologists in patients undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia

Sponsors

Dr.Amit Rastogi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA I and II patients 2. Both male and female patients between 18-65 years of age 3. Elective procedures(Duration of surgery less than 3 hours) 4. Patient with BMI less than 30 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients unable (legally incompetent) or unwilling to give consent. 2. ASA III/IV patients 3. Patients with BMI more than 30 kg/m2 4. Patients in whom Supraglottic devices are contraindicated. 5. Patients with neurological or cognitive deficits, anticipated difficult airway. 6. Patients with increased risk of aspiration. 7. Patients with reduced cardiopulmonary reserve.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine oropharyngeal leak pressure of Non-inflatable SAD I-gel and inflatable SAD Ambu Aura Gain by trainee Anaesthesiologist. Timepoint: Immediate

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
First-time insertion success rate of Non-inflatable LMA i-gel versus inflatable LMA Ambu Aura Gain by trainee Anaesthesiologist. ? No. of attempts required for successful placement of SAD ? Effective device insertion time ? Fiberoptic grading of SAD placement ? Ease of insertion of gastric tube ? Complications- staining of LMA after removal, sore throat ? Ease of insertion by the trainee Timepoint: Immediate & till 24 hours post surgery

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr.Esther

SanjayGandhi Postgraduate institute of medical sciences

amit.rastogi.sgpgi@gmail.com9793124468

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026