FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing two instruments for securing the breathing pathway during a cardiac arrest situation.

Macintosh laryngoscope vs video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during ongoing chest compression in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Arandomised controlled trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/11/059934
Enrollment
72
Registered
2023-11-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I469- Cardiac arrest, cause unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Video laryngoscope: In the intervention group, endotracheal intubation will be done during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a video laryngoscope. The duration of the intervention is

Sponsors

Dr Upendra Hansda
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and requiring endotracheal intubation in the Emergency Department.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i) Return of spontaneous circulation achieved before Endotracheal intubation. ii) Oral malignancy iii) Facial/ airway injury iv) Pregnant Women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
First pass success rateTimepoint: 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken for tracheal intubation and incidence of complications.Timepoint: 30 minutes—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ashwin Kumar VA

AIIMS Bhubaneswar

uhansdah@gmail.com9437365720

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026