FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two newer generation supraglottic airway devices Baska Mask and I Gel in short duration surgeries under general anesthesia

Comparison of Baska Mask with I Gel in adult patients undergoing daycare surgeries under general anesthesia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/11/059853
Enrollment
88
Registered
2023-11-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: I10- Essential (primary) hypertension Health Condition 3: E039- Hypothyroidism, unspecified Health Condition 4: D509- Iron deficiency anemia, unspecified Health Condition 5: E02- Subclinical iodine-deficiency hypothyroidism Health Condition 6: E119- Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications

Interventions

Intervention1: BASKA MASK COMPARISON WITH IGEL: COMPARISON OF BASKA MASK WITH IGEL IN ADULT PATIENTS UNDERGOING DAYCARE SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL ANAETHESIA Intervention2: BASKA MASK IGEL: Intevention u
which may improve the seal, reducing leak and thus causing efficient ventilation. The baska mask incorporates an inlet that fits into the upper oesophagus and the dorsal surface of the cuff is moulded

Sponsors

Dr Moopens Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients planned for daycare surgeries Planned for elective non head and neck surgical intervention by general anesthesia ASA 1 AND 2 No relevant allergies (silicon) BMI (20 to 30 kg/metre square)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency surgeries Neck pathology Previous or anticipated problems with upper airway or upper GI tract Predicted or previousLy documented upper airway Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess efficacy and safety of BASKA MASK and I GEL in terms of airway sealing pressure, peak airway pressure,number of attempts,ease of insertion,post operative complicationsTimepoint: 1 min, 3 min, 5 min,10 min,20 min, 12 hours,24 hours,36hours post device insertion—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To compare and assess time taken for insertion, ease of insertion, number of attempts 2.T o compare and assess post operative complication like sore throatTimepoint: 1 min, 3 min,5 min,10 min,20 min after insertion—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSumiya Fathima

Dr Moopen’s Medical College

shraddhakrupa27@gmail.com9243507325

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026