To compare the effectiveness of Motor Imagery and Task-Orinted Training and Motor Imagery alone on improvement of upper extremity functions in individual with spinal cord injury

A comparison on combined effect of motor imagery with task-oriented training and motor imagery alone on upper extremity Functions in individuals with spinal cord injury. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/11/059705

Enrollment

Registered

2023-11-09

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: GROUP A: MOTOR IMAGERY (To imagine the assigned tasks) (30 mins)+TASK ORIENTED TRAINING (To the assigned tasks in given amount of time) (30 mins) Intervention2: GROUP B: MOTOR IMAGERY (

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. C-SCI (C5-C7) 2. 6 months = C-SCI 3. Both complete and incomplete 4. Both traumatic and non-traumatic SCI 5. Age between 20 to 60 years. 6. MoCA Score = 26/30

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects with any other type of injury that could limit upper extremity function. 2. Visual or hearing impairment. 3. Subjects with severe spasticity (grade = 3, as measured by Modified Ashworth Scale) in upper extremity. 4. Individuals with any diagnosed psychiatric illness. 5. Individuals unable to follow command.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
BOX AND BLOCK TEST Timepoint: Baseline and 3 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
KVIQ CUE-Q ISCI QoL BDSTimepoint: Baseline & 3 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactLipika Malik

Indian Spinal Injuries Centre-Institute of Rehablitation Sciences

lipika.otist@gmail.com9999931199

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026