Comparison of quality of recovery following intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia.

Quality of recovery following Total intravenous anaesthesia versus Inhalational anaesthesia in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a Pilot randomized study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/11/059580

Enrollment

100

Registered

2023-11-06

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Propofol: Titrated according to BIS and hemodynamic parameters included in study, intravenous route, 2-4 hours. Control Intervention2: Sevoflurane: Titrated according to BIS and

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: BMI 18-27kg/msq American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I-II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of allergy to anaesthetic agent History of long term use of hypnotics, sedatives, substance abuse Patient not consenting to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The Quality of Recovery-15 scoreTimepoint: At 24 hours and 48 hours post operatively.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
intraoperative hemodynamic parameters Mean arterial pressure (MAP) Heart rate(HR) Recovery from anaesthesiaTimepoint: before induction(T0), 3 minutes after intubation (T1), post incision (T2), after trendelenburg postural change (T3), at the end of surgery (T4), at the exit from PACU (T5) Time to extubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shikha Sharma

Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi

sshikha18@gmail.com9810382283

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026