Comparison of Channelled versus Non-channelled blades while performing video laryngoscopy: A randomised control study

Comparison of Channelled versus Non-channelled blades in first pass success & time to intubate while performing video laryngoscopy in patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the emergency department – A randomised control study - NILL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/11/059501

Enrollment

146

Registered

2023-11-03

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Channeled Blade: The endotracheal tube will be pre fitted in the channeled blade of video laryngoscope. Control Intervention1: Non Channeled Blade: The endotracheal tube will be inserte

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: MALE AND FEMALE ABOVE 18 YEARS OF AGE

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: All patients requiring crash intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
-Comparing the first pass success of channelled v/s non channelled blades by using Video laryngoscopeTimepoint: Baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
-Time taken to intubate -Switching of blades/laryngoscope -Adverse events – esophageal intubation,3 attempts,etc Timepoint: Baseline	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anubhooti Mahawar

MAX Superspeciality Hospital

khardsaumya@gmail.com9892045932

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026