Skip to content

Effectiveness of interarch elastics vs occlusal turbos in the treatment of skeletal class 2 malocclusion in growing patients.

Efficacy of intermaxillary elastics vs functional bite turbos in the treatment of skeletal class 2 malocclusion in growing patients: an experimental study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/11/059446
Enrollment
28
Registered
2023-11-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: FUNCTIONAL BITE TRBOS: MBT (Mclaughlin Bennet Trevesi) kit of metal brackets- mini 2000, having 0.022 slot manufactured by Ormco were used for the study. Upper and lower arches were bon

Sponsors

PRAVARA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES LONI DISTRICT AHMADNAGAR
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.The facial type of all patients was mesoprosopic to brachyprosopic with convex facial Profile suggestive of mild to moderate Angles Class II Divison I Malocclusion with favourable growth pattern. 2.All patients with early permanent dentition with prepubertal growth spurt /circumpubertal growth spurt. 3.Patients of either gender 4.Both the dental arches well aligned and did not demand the Prefunctional phase. 5.Skeletal Maturity Analysis has been done for all subjects through cervical vertebral maturity index of Hassel and Farman (CVMI) and MP3 analysis. All subjects were either in stage 3 or stage 4 of CVMI These two skeletal maturity indices were selected as they give the amount of potential percentage of growth completed or remained. Above two indicators showed that the subjects were in about 30-45% of potential growth is remained. 6.Clinical VTO (Visualized Treatment Objective) was positive in each patient. 7.None of the subject had undergone any orthodontic treatment before inclusion of them in the present study. 8.All subjects were free from symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders. 9.All subjects were free of subjective neuromuscular, auditory and mandibular dysfunction syndrome. 10.All patients who understand the treatment plan and are ready to give written Informed Consent. 11.All patients ready to complete the scheduled Follow-up 12.Functional, Clinical and Cephalometric evaluation suggested the functional retrusion of the lower jaw.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with Congenital deformity of Oro-Facial structures or having Pharyngeal pathology. 2.Patients with Systemic and Psychological disorders 3.Patients of Class II malocclusion with Severe Proclination of Lower Incisors 4.Patients with complaints of nasal obstruction. 5.Patients with Chronic ulcers in oral cavity. 6.Patients with Chronic Periodontitis. 7.Previously orthodontically treated Patients. 8.Patients whose growth phase has ceased.

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Primary

MeasureTime frame
TO CORRECT RETRUDED LOWER JAWTimepoint: zero, six and twelve months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Yash goenka

PRAVARA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES LONI

drngtoshniwal@gmail.com9822353228

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026