FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between usg guided spinal anaesthesia and usg guided pre spinal anesthesia in obese pregnant women

To compare the effectiveness of Real-time Ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia versus pre-procedural Ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia in obese parturients. A randomized control trial - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/10/059026
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-10-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O00-O9A- Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium

Interventions

Intervention1: Real time ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia: By using linear probe of ultrasound machine the exact lumbar space where spinal anesthesia will be given is identified in obese partiruent

Sponsors

SHRI B M PATIL MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Parturients who are for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with BMI >30kg/m2 ASA 2-3 Age 18 to 35yrs >37 weeks of gestation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency c section Contraindications for spinal anesthesia History of lumbar spinal diseases and lumbar surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Successful spinal anesthesia with respect to time for indentifying the space Timepoint: After 1 minute of giving spinal anaesthesia—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken for successful lumbar puncture & analgesiaTimepoint: 90 seconds or more—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Suman S Hiremath

BLDE DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY SHRI B M PATIL MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE

pratibhakaradi@gmail.com9113986609

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026