Comparison of two ways of nasal wind pipe insertion- using normal method vs guarding the end of the wind pipe tube with Foleys catheter.

Comparison of Foleys catheter shielding versus convetional technique in reduction of mucosal trauma during nasotracheal intubation- Randomized Comparative Study - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/10/058958

Enrollment

Registered

2023-10-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S026- Fracture of mandible Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Nasotracheal Intubation: Nasotracheal Intubation with Foleys Catheter shielding the tip of Endotracheal tube Control Intervention1: Nasotracheal Intubation: Conventional Nasotracheal In

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing surgeries which require nasotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients having fracture of Cribriform bone Patients having CSF rhinorrhea Patients having a bleeding disorder History of nasal trauma with active / acute bleeding ENT pathology like polyp, adenoid Patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Incidence of mucosal trauma during nasotracheal intubation by looking for soiling of endotracheal tube cuff.Timepoint: 60 sec	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1) Number of Passes 2) Incidence of First pass success rate 3) Procedural failureTimepoint: 90 sec	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPARTHASARATHY S

MAHATMA GANDHI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE

painfreepartha@gmail.com9443142582

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026