Skip to content

“Comparative evaluation of marginal fit, internal fit and cement space of a tooth colored crown with a finished margin by two different methods of fabrication. ?

“Comparative evaluation of marginal fit, internal fit and cement space of single unit lithium disilicate crown with shoulder finish line by two different methods of fabrication. ?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/10/058847
Enrollment
54
Registered
2023-10-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Group B will consist of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by conventional method.: All patients to be examined will be selected from patients coming to out-patient department(OPD) of

Sponsors

Madhavi Selukar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Full veneer 1st molar restoration. 2) Patients in age group of 18-54 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Cantilever cases where single crown is taken as an abutment to replace a missing tooth. 2) Mobile abutments. 3) Abutment tooth whose height is less than 4mm. 4) Patient allergic to other substances.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The expected outcome or result is that the crown fabricated with CAD-CAM will give good fit & result compared to pressed method.Timepoint: 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint: Nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSurekha Godbole Dubey

Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital. Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research

surekha.prostho@dmiher.edu.in9960084785

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026