Difference between effect of Biofeedback therapy and Mirror therapy for improving lower extremity function in patients with acute and subacute Stroke- A randomised clinical trial

Comparison between 4 weeks of Biofeedback therapy and Mirror therapy for improving dorsiflexion and lower extremity function in patients with acute and subacute Stroke- A randomised clinical trial - RCT

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/10/058746

Enrollment

Registered

2023-10-17

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G819- Hemiplegia, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Biofeedback therapy: To improve range of ankle dorsiflexion within 4weeks Control Intervention1: Mirror Therapy: To improve the range of ankle dorsiflexion within 4 weeks

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with first ever acute or sub-acute Stroke. 2. Patients who are cooperative, motivated, and willing to participate in the study. 3. Patients with reduced range of ankle dorsiflexion (0-100).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with vision-hearing problems. 2. Patients with peripheral vascular diseases in the lower extremity. 3. Patients with ankle contracture.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Brunnstorm stage of recovery range of ankle dorsiflexionTimepoint: Baseline 2 weeks 4 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Chadock’s McMaster Assessment Scale Modified Motor Assessment Scale BOBO MotionTimepoint: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Suvarna Ganvir

Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil Foundation College of Physiotherapy

maheshwariharishchandre@gmail.com9130054937

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026