Skip to content

A Study to compare the efficacy and safety of PZN-128 in treatment chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.

A randomized, international, multicenter double-blind study to compare the efficacy,safety, and immunogenicity of PZN-128 powder for solution for subcutaneous injection 250 µg (Pharmasyntez Nord JSC, Russia) versus ?omparator drug in patients with chronic idiopathic (immune) thrombocytopenic purpura. - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/10/058677
Enrollment
203
Registered
2023-10-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: D758- Other specified diseases of bloodand blood-forming organs

Interventions

Intervention1: PZN-128: Romiplostim The safety and efficacy of romiplostim have been evaluated for up to 5 years of continuous treatment. In clinical trials, treatment with Romiplostim resulted in dos

Sponsors

PHARMASYNTEZ-NORD JSC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Informed consent to participate in the study. 2. Patients of both genders aged from 18 years. 3. Patients with diagnosed chronic idiopathic (autoimmune) thrombocytopenic purpura resistant to the first-line therapy. 4. Platelet count at the time of screening 5. Patients agreed to use a reliable method of contraception during the study up to its completion (for the subjects with reproductive potential). 6. Patients, in the Investigatorâ??s opinion, understand the requirements which should be fulfilled for the participation in the study and are ready to follow them

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Withdrawal of informed consent. 2. Erroneous inclusion (violation of inclusion and non-inclusion criteria). 3. The Investigatorâ??s or Sponsorâ??s decision to exclude a patient from the study due to clinically significant deviation from/violation of the protocol. 4. Serious adverse events or adverse events (e.g. allergy) not meeting the seriousness criteria with the development of which, in the Investigatorâ??s opinion, the further participation in the study will be detrimental for the patientâ??s health or well-being. 5. Any adverse event (may be not drug related) requiring observation, procedures and/or drug treatment prohibited by this study protocol. 6. Loss of contact with a patient and loss to the visit. 7. The need of the therapy prohibited by the protocol. 8. Patient became pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of patients who required emergency therapy to prevent clinically significant bleeding. Timepoint: Number (percentage) of patients with persistent response to treatment determined as platelet count 50â??Ã?â??109 /L for 6 weeks of last 8-week therapy period in the absence of emergency therapy for relief of hemorrhagic synd

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number (percentage) of patients with platelet counts â?¥ 250â??Ã?â??109 /L for â?¥ 8 weeksTimepoint: Median time 7 weeks with a platelet response (i.e., the time when platelet counts were â?¥ 250â??Ã?â??109 /L during the therapy). â?¢ Percentage of patients who required emergency therapy to prevent clinically significant bleeding.

Countries

India, Russian Federation

Contacts

Public ContactDr Umakanta Sahoo

GCT Pharma Research (India) Pvt. Ltd.

U.Sahoo@gctrials.com912242369729

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026