Skip to content

Comparison of two new behaviour management techniques in children

Comparison of two novel distraction techniques: an in vivo study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/10/058451
Enrollment
300
Registered
2023-10-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Eye movement distraction technique- A novel distraction method: Patient is asked to roll their eyes in clockwise and anticlockwise direction while administering maxillary local infiltra

Sponsors

DrHarshita Gosavi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Children aged 6-12 years old of either gender 2) Negative Frankl behavior rating scale 3) Needle phobic patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients not willing to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1)Eye movement distraction is as effective as WITAUL technique in reducing pain perception during local infiltration. 2) eye movement distraction is as effetive as WITAUL technique in reducing anxiety in patients receiving local infiltration.Timepoint: Post operatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Eye movement technique and WITAUL can be used for distraction during local anesthesiaTimepoint: Post operatively

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHARSHITA GOSAVI

RUHS College of Dental Sciences,Jaipur

drsandeeptandon@yahoo.co.in

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026