Comparison of safety and efficacy of two LMA devices in patients undergoing minor surgical procedures under General Anaesthesia.

Comparison of safety and efficacy of I-Gel and blockbuster laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing minor surgical procedures under general anaesthesia- A Randomized control study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/10/058401

Enrollment

Registered

2023-10-06

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N62- Hypertrophy of breast

Interventions

Intervention1: Blockbuster Laryngeal mask airway: IT IS A SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE used for less than 1 hour to provide airway to the patient Control Intervention1: I gel LARYNGEAL mASK AIRWAY: IS A

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA PS I AND II MALLAMPATI I AND II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA PS III MALLAMPATI III AND IV ORAL PATHOLOGIES

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
to determine the ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic glottic score of both lmaTimepoint: immediately after insertion of airway	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
to determine no of attempts & time duration for insertionTimepoint: immediately after insertion of airway	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr.Parghavi

sri manakula vinayagar medical college and hospital

dr.ramyaa@gmail.com07538886690

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026