Compare between Ultrasound Guided Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for reduce pain after surgery in patients of Intertrochanteric Fracture Femur undergoing fixation with interlocking nail

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Anterior Quadratus Lumborum block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Postoperative Analgesia in patients of Intertrochanteric Fracture Femur undergoing fixation with interlocking nail: A prospective Randomised double blind interventional study at SMS Medical College Jaipur - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/10/058313

Enrollment

106

Registered

2023-10-05

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Group A -Patients undergoing ORIF with ILN under spinal anaesthesia and anterior quadratus lumborum block with 30ml of 0.5 % bupivacaine.: The patient will be placed in the supine posi

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients of intertrochanteric fracture femur undergoing open reduction internal fixation with interlocking nailing. 2. Patients willing to participate in study and cooperative patients. 3. Patients of either gender in age group of 40 to 80 years. 4. Patients of ASA grade I, II and III. 5. Patients with BMI of 18-30 kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patents with history of coagulopathies and any neuropathy. 2. Patients allergic to local anaesthetic(Bupivacaine). 3. Patients with local pathology at the injection site. 4. Patients with disability limiting the performance of block.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1) To assess and compare the difference in the mean duration of postoperative analgesia in both groups. 2) To assess and compare the difference in the mean duration of time taken for performing both blocks. 3) To assess and compare the mean percentage of cases who experienced pain during spinal positioning. 4) To assess and compare the difference in the mean number of doses of opioids consumed in the postoperative period in both groups.Timepoint: 1) To assess and compare the difference in mean NRS score immediately after block, 10, 20, and 30 mins after block and 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18 and 24 hours postoperatively. 2) Time required to perform the procedure in minutes. 3) Opoiod consumption within 24 hours of the postoperative period.	—

Measure

Time frame

1) To assess and compare the difference in the mean duration of postoperative analgesia in both groups. 2) To assess and compare the difference in the mean duration of time taken for performing both blocks. 3) To assess and compare the mean percentage of cases who experienced pain during spinal positioning. 4) To assess and compare the difference in the mean number of doses of opioids consumed in the postoperative period in both groups.Timepoint: 1) To assess and compare the difference in mean NRS score immediately after block, 10, 20, and 30 mins after block and 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18 and 24 hours postoperatively. 2) Time required to perform the procedure in minutes. 3) Opoiod consumption within 24 hours of the postoperative period.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
quadriceps muscle weakness and side effectsTimepoint: Evaluation of quadriceps muscle weakness and side effects within 1st 12 hours	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sumeet patil

Sawai Mansingh Medical College, Jaipur

vandanamangal25@gmail.com9829056816

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026