Laryngeal mask airway insertion techniques in General Anaesthesia

Comparative evaluation of three insertion techniques for Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway placement in patients undergoing elective surgery under General Anaesthesia. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/09/058139

Enrollment

180

Registered

2023-09-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparative evaluation of three insertion techniques for Proseal Laryngeal Mask airway placement under General Anaesthesia.: This study is Randomized comparative study. In this, interve

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: After obtaining informed and written consent, patients of either sex, aged between 18-65 years, belonging to ASA physical status I and II, with Modified Mallampati grading I and II, BMI: 18-30kg/m 2 undergoing elective surgical procedures under General Anaesthesia will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with anticipated difficult airway (Modified Mallampati grading III and IV, Inter incisor distance 2. Patient with recent history of Sore throat or LRTI. 3. Patients having risk of aspiration (Pregnancy, Gastric Esophageal Reflux Disease, Hiatus Hernia, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Rate of first attempt successful insertion among the three insertion techniques.Timepoint: Baseline (holding Laryngeal mask airway in hand) till chest rise and first full square wave form on capnography measured in Seconds (usually within 30 seconds) and monitoring hemodynamic changes at baseline,1 min,3 min, 5 min	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare: Overall success rate of insertion (total of 3 attempts), 2. Time taken for insertion, 3. Need for external airway manipulations, 4. Measurement of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), 5. Fiber Optic Bronchoscopy grading (FOB). 6. Adverse events like blood stain over LMA, incidence & severity of sore throat, pain on swallowing after PLMA insertion using three different insertion techniques of PLMA placement in patients undergoing elective surgeries under General Anaesthesia. Timepoint: Baseline 1 min 3 min 5 min	—

Measure

Time frame

To compare: Overall success rate of insertion (total of 3 attempts), 2. Time taken for insertion, 3. Need for external airway manipulations, 4. Measurement of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), 5. Fiber Optic Bronchoscopy grading (FOB). 6. Adverse events like blood stain over LMA, incidence & severity of sore throat, pain on swallowing after PLMA insertion using three different insertion techniques of PLMA placement in patients undergoing elective surgeries under General Anaesthesia. Timepoint: Baseline 1 min 3 min 5 min

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr VijayS

ESIC,Medical college and Hospital,Faridabad,Haryana

krishnanvijay3@gmail.com9080717685

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026