Jawbone reduction around titanium dental artificial roots and the depth of titanium roots in bone as observed on dental X rays

An evaluation of radiographic proximal bone level and its correlation with depth of placement of platform switched grade 4 titanium implants having sand blasted- acid etched surfaces – A clinical trial - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/09/058114

Enrollment

Registered

2023-09-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Placement of implant in partially edentulous alveolar ridges: Measuring the proximal bone level and correlating with depth of placement in platform switch implant immediately after pla

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Systemically healthy subject [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade 1 or 2]. (2) Absence of oral disorders like, desquamative gingivitis, mucocutaneous lesions, premalignant and malignant lesions, xerostomia, oral submucous fibrosis and other untreated long standing lesions. (3) Age 18 - 75 years. (4) Healed alveolar ridges (at least 4months after tooth extraction). (5) Sufficient width, height, length and angulation of bone to accommodate an implant in native bone. (6) No history of bone augmentation procedures at the implant site.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Pregnant or lactating subjects. (2) Severe bruxism. (3) Failure to maintain good plaque control. (4) Any systemic condition like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, cancer, HIV, disorders that compromise wound healing, bone metabolic diseases, immuno-suppressive therapy which would preclude periodontal surgery. (5) Presence of acute infectious lesions in the areas intended for implant surgery. (6) Severely compromised inter occlusal distance. (7) Uncontrolled periodontal diseases and/ or adjacent teeth that exceeded grade I mobility. (8) Unrealistic expectations about the procedure. (9) Subjects having tobacco habits. (10) Subjects having psychological illness.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Proximal bone loss around platform switched implantTimepoint: Proximal bone loss around platform switched implant baseline versus 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Relation between depth of placement of platform switch implant & proximal bone level 6 months after placement of implant. Periodontal probing depth and gingival bleeding score around implant. Timepoint: 6 Months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Omkumar Baghele

Maharashtra Institute of Dental Sciences and Research dental college Latur.

sonudalvi.95@gmail.com9175995138

Outcome results