assessing treatment outcome in patients own words when treating them via 3 different treatment options

"The Effects of Myofunctional Therapy, Fixed Functional Mechanotherapy, and Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment on Patients Presenting with Skeletal Class II Deformity: An Outcome Study Using the FACE-Q Report." - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/09/058083

Enrollment

180

Registered

2023-09-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures Health Condition 2: Z00-Z13- Persons encountering health services for examinations

Interventions

Intervention1: fixed functional mechanotherapy: In adult patients where little growth is left, fixed functional appliances are used for the advancement of mandible along with fixed orthodontic treatme

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. mild to moderate Skeletal Class II patients 2. patients with horizontal or average growth pattern 3. presence of all permanent teeth (except third molars). 4. patients who can comprehend English language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i) Severe Skeletal Class II patients (ANB > 7 degrees) ii) Class II patients indicated for orthognathic surgery. iii) Presence of a craniofacial syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Patients perception about the treatment modalities will be knownTimepoint: 1 month within completion of treatment	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
compliance of the patient can be foundTimepoint: 1.5 to 2 years	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPriya Dogra

Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies

drashish.singh@gmail.com9910412234

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026