FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the efficacy of two commonly used techniques for post surgical wound pain in lumbar spine surgery - bilateral ultrasound guided Erector spinae plane block v/s post surgical wound infiltration

BILATERAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK V/S WOUND INFILTRATION FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY- A COMPARATIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/09/058034
Enrollment
56
Registered
2023-09-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

LINCY THANGAM JAYARAJ
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient scheduled for elective and emergency lumbar spine surgery Patients between age 18-60 years of age Patients under ASA PS I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal to enroll for the study Patient with the renal impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To assess pain relief in the first 24h as measured by NRS in both groups. 2.Time for rescue analgesia in both groups. 3.Cumulative morphine consumption in the first 24h of the postoperative period in both groups.Timepoint: 24hours—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To find out any side effects during block or post-block in both groups. 2.Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia at the end of 24 h in both groups. Timepoint: 24hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR M GOVINDRAJ BHAT

KS HEGDE MEDICAL ACADEMY

govindrajbhat@nitte.edu.in9343561152

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026