Comparison of two different insertion techniques of supraglottic airway device named Air-q in pediatrics surgery by mean of fibreoptic assessment

Comparison of Fiber-optic Assessment in Midline versus Rotatioanl Insertion Technique of Air-Q in pediatricsSurgeries;aRandomisedDouble Blind Interventional Study in Department of Anaesthesiology ,SMS Medical college and Hospital Jaipur - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/09/057881

Enrollment

120

Registered

2023-09-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N00-N99- Diseases of the genitourinary system

Interventions

Intervention1: midline insertion technique of Air-Q: fiber-optic assessment in midline insertion technique of Air-Q in pediatric surgeries a randomised double blind interventional study Once Total d

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a. A.S.A. I and II b. Age range between 5 years to 12 years. c. Weight between 10 to 30 kg d. Elective inguinal, urological procedures for which SADs are routinely used. e. Parents or caregiver willing to participate in study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a. Patient with acute upper respiratory iinfection. b. Patient with difficult airway. c. Surgery time more than one hrs. d. Emergency surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1.Mean grading of fibre-optic bronchoscopic assessment of laryngeal view through Air-Q. 2.Mean Time of Insertion 3.Mean Score of ease of Insertion 4.Mean Number of attempts Timepoint: mean time of insertion of AIR-Q insertion(in seconds)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Mean Number of patients showing post operation complications like sore throat, cough, laryngospasm, & trauma (blood on the device after removalTimepoint: 1.sore throat 2 cough 3.laryngospasm & trauma (blood on the device after remova;Mean Number of patients showing post operation complications like sore throat, cough, laryngospasm, & trauma (blood on the device after removal of device)Timepoint: Intraoperative Hemodynamic Monitoring baseline Post induction(1 minute) After insertion of Air-Q (immediatly) 1 mintue 2 mintue 5 mintue 10 mintue 15 mintue 20 mintue 30 mintue	—

Measure

Time frame

Mean Number of patients showing post operation complications like sore throat, cough, laryngospasm, & trauma (blood on the device after removalTimepoint: 1.sore throat 2 cough 3.laryngospasm & trauma (blood on the device after remova;Mean Number of patients showing post operation complications like sore throat, cough, laryngospasm, & trauma (blood on the device after removal of device)Timepoint: Intraoperative Hemodynamic Monitoring baseline Post induction(1 minute) After insertion of Air-Q (immediatly) 1 mintue 2 mintue 5 mintue 10 mintue 15 mintue 20 mintue 30 mintue

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Amandeep Kaur

Sawai Man Singh medical college Jaipur

chatterjeerama30@gmail.com9828622026

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026