FindTrial
Sign In

To compare the efficacy of ultrasonograph guided versus combined ultrasonograph guided with peripheral nerve stimulator for supraclavicular blocks

To compare the efficacy of ultrasonograph guided versus combined ultrasonograph guided with peripheral nerve stimulator for supraclavicular blocks

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/09/057873
Enrollment
82
Registered
2023-09-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M654- Radial styloid tenosynovitis [de Quervain]

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Kasturba medical college,mangalore
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)ASA1 and 2 2)those undergoing upper limb procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA >2 Age greater than 60

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Heart rate, blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, SPO2, respiratory rateTimepoint: Insertion of needle, injection of drug—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of block Efficacy of blockTimepoint: Procedural time—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sunil B V

Department of Anesthesiology, Kasturba medical college

drsunilbv@gmail.com9620178559

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026