FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of videolaryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope in routine intubation in adult patients

A comparative study of king vision video laryngoscope with macintosh laryngoscope in adult patients for routine intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/09/057808
Enrollment
140
Registered
2023-09-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Nil: Nil Control Intervention2: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Dr Mahitha Yanamadala
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia Patients of ASA 1 and ASA 2 Mallampatti Grade 1 to 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampatti grade 4, mouth opening less than 2 finger breadth , BMI >30kg/m2 Patients needing emergency surgeries will be excluded Pregnancy and lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Best glottic view(cormack Lehane grading achieved) Time taken for intubation Timepoint: 1.Best glottic view(cormack Lehane grading achieved)-immeadiatley after laryngoscopy 2.Time taken for intubation (time from when the laryngoscope enters the inter-incisor area to visual conformation of the tube entering the glottis)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Heart rate Systolic blood pressure Diastolic blood pressure Peripheral oxygen saturation Timepoint: Before Induction Before Laryngoscopy Immediately after intubation 3minutes after intubation Time taken to intubate—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mahitha yanamadala

Kasturba medical college mangalore

sureshyv63@gmail.com9845085108

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026