Comparison of two different techniques for vestibular deepening with lower front teeth region

Evaluation of vestibular deepening procedure with & without periosteal fenestration in shallow mandibular labial vestibule: a randomized clinical trial - VDF

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/09/057738

Enrollment

Registered

2023-09-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Vestibular deepening of shallow mandibular labial vestibule with periosteal fenestration: Mandibular labial vestibular deepening with blunt periosteal dissection by displacing the perio

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Both the genders. 2. Subjects with age ranging between18-40 years. 3. Systemically healthy subjects without having any medical illness which can impact on surgical protocol. 4. Patients signing written consent form. 5. Subjects indicated for vestibular deepening procedure in Shallow mandibular labial vestibule concomitant with any of the following conditions. ? Buccally placed mandibular anterior teeth. ? Gingival recession in mandibular anterior teeth. ? Abnormal frenal/muscle/mucosal folds in mandibular anterior region. ? Any other relevant aetiology.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Participants having history of delayed wound healing. 2. Participants consuming tobacco in any form. 3. Pregnant and lactating females. 4. Missing 1 or 2 mandibular anterior teeth excluding canines. 5.Participants otherwise not maintaining oral hygiene after phase I therapy. 6. Patients with history of periodontal surgery within last 3 months. 7. Presence of periodontal pockets ( >3mm) in mandibular anterior region. 8. Patients with known bleeding disorders. 9. Presence of mobility ( > grade II) in mandibular anterior teeth. 10. Physically handicapped and mentally disabled subjects. 11. Participants with known allergies to the drugs used for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate increased vestibular depth after vestibular deepening procedure done with & without periosteal fenestrationTimepoint: preoperatively & postoperatively at 1 month & at 3 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate & compare the difference in oral hygiene status (Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Oral hygiene index simplified) before & after vestibular deepening procedure done with and without periosteal fenestration Timepoint: Preoperatively postoperatively at 1 month & 3 months;To evaluate & compare wound healing score of vestibular deepening done with and without periosteal fenestration at 1 week and 1 month post surgically. Timepoint: at 1 week & one month postoperatively	—

Measure

Time frame

To evaluate & compare the difference in oral hygiene status (Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Oral hygiene index simplified) before & after vestibular deepening procedure done with and without periosteal fenestration Timepoint: Preoperatively postoperatively at 1 month & 3 months;To evaluate & compare wound healing score of vestibular deepening done with and without periosteal fenestration at 1 week and 1 month post surgically. Timepoint: at 1 week & one month postoperatively

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGauri Ugale

Maharashtra institute of dental sciences and research ,Latur

rutujaj36@gmail.com7038158811

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026