FindTrial
Sign In

Are residual posterior urethral valves missed if only imaging is done without endoscopy?

Comparison of follow up micturating cystourethrogram versus check cystoscopy for completeness of ablation of posterior urethral valves - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/09/057591
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-09-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Q642- Congenital posterior urethral valves

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Office of Director General Armed Forces Medical Services
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Male neonates with antenatal/postnatal diagnosis of posterior urethral valves 2.Children less than 14 years with newly diagnosed PUV. 3.Neonates and children less than 14 years who have undergone PUV ablation within 3 months before reporting to the two study centres.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Neonates and children with associated with associated anorectal anomalies. 2.Children who underwent bladder/spine/pelvic surgeries. 3.Parents unwilling to participate in the surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Completeness of ablation of posterior urethral valve as seen on cystourethroscopyTimepoint: 3 months after primary ablation of PUV—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in MCUG findings after valve ablationTimepoint: 3 months after primary ablation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRavi Patcharu

Command Hospital Air Force

ravipatcharu@gmail.com9717587671

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026